Skip to content
Céréales Crush pâte à tartiner
Céréales Crush pâte à tartiner - Favrichon with score 55/100

Céréales Crush pâte à tartiner - European Score 55/100

Favrichon

Céréales Crush pâte à tartiner by Favrichon is rated 55/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a food product found in 1 countries.

375 g

3111900330115
🛡️ Data verified by Open Food Facts
🍽️ Food

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
B
Eco-Score
B
NOVA
4

Ingredients

Céréales (blé complet 28,6%, maïs 19,1%, avoine complète 10,3%, son de blé 3,9%), pâte à tartiner 33,6% (farine de pois chiche, sucre de canne, huile de tournesol, pâte de noisette 4%, cacao maigre en poudre 2,3%, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol, sel de mer), sucre de canne non raffiné, sel de mer.

Allergens

gluten, nuts

Origin Data

Countries france

European Score

0 /100
Distant Relative

"It has a cousin in Europe, but they haven't spoken in years."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 0/10
Distribution 15/15
EU Certifications +5

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in France & Monaco (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Main ingredients not European
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (1 countries) (+15 pts)
  • European certification: eu-organic (+5 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

With a critical score of 0/100, Céréales Crush pâte à tartiner shows a total lack of verifiable alignment with European industrial sovereignty.

When analyzing the corporate structure of Favrichon, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Moderate transport mileage makes this a balanced but not leadership-level choice for the environment.

The lack of transparent health data for this product is a significant concern for the European consumer.

Transparency from Favrichon on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

Fact-based analysis identifies the product as a poor choice for those prioritizing local roots.

Looking for better alternatives...