Skip to content
We Love European Products
Mousse de Canard au porto
Mousse de Canard au porto - U with score 50/100

Mousse de Canard au porto - European Score 50/100

U

Mousse de Canard au porto by U is rated 50/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a product product found in 1 countries. It falls under the categories of: Fresh foods, Prepared meats, Ducks, fr:Mousses de canard au porto, fr:Mousses.

180 g

3256220021210

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
E
Eco-Score
E
NOVA
4

Categories

meats and their products spreads fresh foods meat preparations meats prepared meats salted spreads poultries ducks meat spreads

Ingredients

Gras de porc (origine France), foie maigre de canard 22 % (origine UE), foie de poulet (origine UE), graisse de canard 7,8% (origine UE), CREME, OEUFS, farine de BLE, sel, sucre, porto ( 1 %), poivre, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Nappage : graisse de porc, colorant : caroténoïdes. Traces de moutarde.

Origin Data

Countries france
Packaging Plastique, Frais, Sous atmosphère protectrice, Opercule, Barquette, Film plastique, Tranche

European Score

0 /100
Distant Relative

"It has a cousin in Europe, but they haven't spoken in years."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 0/10
Distribution 15/15

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in France & Monaco (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Ingredients not specified
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (1 countries) (+15 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

The European Score of 50/100 for Mousse de Canard au porto suggests a moderate alignment with regional economic standards.

When analyzing the corporate structure of U, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Data confirms that this product fails to meet basic regional ecological expectations.

The lack of transparent health data for this product is a significant concern for the European consumer.

Transparency from U on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

This is a typical market choice, offering some European ties without absolute excellence.

Looking for better alternatives...