Skip to content
Flan nappé caramel
Flan nappé caramel - Envia, Lidl with score 60/100

Flan nappé caramel - European Score 60/100

Envia, Lidl

Flan nappé caramel by Envia, Lidl is rated 60/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a food product found in 1 countries.

2x(6x100) 1.2 kg

4056489109914
🛡️ Data verified by Open Food Facts
🍽️ Food

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
C
Eco-Score
UNKNOWN
NOVA
4

Ingredients

72.3% LAIT (ORIGINE: FRANCE) À 1.1% DE MATIÈRE GRASSE, SUCRE, EAU. 6% CARAMEL (SIROP DE GLUCOSE-FRUCTOSE, SUCRE, EAU). AMIDON DE MAÏS. AMIDON MODIFIÉ DE MAIS ET/OU DE POMME DE TERRE, POUDRE DE LAIT (ORIGINE: FRANCE) ÉCRÉMÉ, ÉPAISSISSANTS: CARRAGHÉNANES. GOMME XANTHANE, PECTINES: AROME. LACTOSE COLORANT: Caroténoïdes.

Allergens

milk

Origin Data

Countries france
Packaging Etui en carton,Opercule en métal,Pot en plastique

European Score

0 /100
European Resident

"Pays taxes and recycles properly. Almost one of us."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 10/10
Distribution 15/15

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in Germany (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Main European ingredients: LAIT (+10 pts)
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (1 countries) (+15 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

With a critical score of 0/100, Flan nappé caramel shows a total lack of verifiable alignment with European industrial sovereignty.

When analyzing the corporate structure of Envia, Lidl, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Data confirms that this product fails to meet basic regional ecological expectations.

Regarding health, this product offers full transparency on its ingredients and composition.

Transparency from Envia, Lidl on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

Fact-based analysis identifies the product as a poor choice for those prioritizing local roots.

Looking for better alternatives...