Skip to content
Chicken poke bowl
Chicken poke bowl - Raku with score 50/100

Chicken poke bowl - European Score 50/100

Raku

Chicken poke bowl by Raku is rated 50/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a product product found in 1 countries.

360g

5035272048011

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
B
Eco-Score
UNKNOWN
NOVA
4

Categories

Ingredients

Cooked rice (water, rice, sugar, spirit vinegar, rice vinegar, salt, rapeseed oil, fructose-glucose syrup, cane molasses), cooked chicken breast (13%) (chicken breast, salt, cornflour), soy sesame dressing (9%) (water, soy sauce (water, soya beans, wheat, salt, alcohol), sugar, rice vinegar, sesame seed oil, modified maize starch, onion purée, spirit vinegar, apple juice concentrate, ginger purée, lemon juice concentrate, lime juice concentrate, garlic powder, white pepper), spicy edamame beans mix (8%) (edamame beans (soya), spring onion, white sesame seeds, red pepper powder), salted cucumber (8%) (cucumber, salt), pickled red cabbage (5%) (red cabbage, rice vinegar, sugar, salt), carrot (2%), white sesame seeds, black sesame seeds.

Origin Data

Countries ireland

European Score

0 /100
Distant Relative

"It has a cousin in Europe, but they haven't spoken in years."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 0/10
Distribution 15/15

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in United Kingdom (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Ingredients not specified
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (1 countries) (+15 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

The European Score of 50/100 for Chicken poke bowl suggests a moderate alignment with regional economic standards.

When analyzing the corporate structure of Raku, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Data confirms that this product fails to meet basic regional ecological expectations.

The lack of transparent health data for this product is a significant concern for the European consumer.

Transparency from Raku on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

This is a typical market choice, offering some European ties without absolute excellence.

Looking for better alternatives...