Skip to content
Pommes duchesse
Pommes duchesse - European product with score 50/100

Pommes duchesse - European Score 50/100

Unknown Brand

Pommes duchesse is rated 50/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a food product found in 1 countries.

1 kg

7616800490007
🛡️ Data verified by Open Food Facts
🍽️ Food

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
C
Eco-Score
A
NOVA
4

Ingredients

eau, flocons de pommes de terre 22% (pommes de terre 99%, émulsifiant: E 471, stabilisant: diphosphates, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, antioxydant: E 304, disulfite de sodium et acide ascorbique, épice), huile de tournesol, lait écrémé en poudre, blanc d'_œuf_ en poudre (d'élevage au sol), amidon de mals modifé, sel de culsine, extrait d'épices.

Allergens

eggs, milk

Origin Data

Countries switzerland
Packaging Sachet plastique

European Score

0 /100
Distant Relative

"It has a cousin in Europe, but they haven't spoken in years."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 0/10
Distribution 15/15

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in Switzerland (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Main ingredients not European
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (1 countries) (+15 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

The European Score of 50/100 for Pommes duchesse suggests a moderate alignment with regional economic standards.

When analyzing the corporate structure of the manufacturer, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Data confirms that this product fails to meet basic regional ecological expectations.

The lack of transparent health data for this product is a significant concern for the European consumer.

Transparency from the manufacturer on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

This is a typical market choice, offering some European ties without absolute excellence.

Looking for better alternatives...