Skip to content
Tablette Kinder Chocolat Chocolat au Lait x24 -300g
Tablette Kinder Chocolat Chocolat au Lait x24 -300g - Ferrero, Kinder with score 60/100

Tablette Kinder Chocolat Chocolat au Lait x24 -300g - European Score 60/100

Ferrero, Kinder

Tablette Kinder Chocolat Chocolat au Lait x24 -300g by Ferrero, Kinder is rated 60/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a food product found in 2 countries.

300 g

8000500036952
🛡️ Data verified by Open Food Facts
🍽️ Food

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
E
Eco-Score
D
NOVA
4

Ingredients

Chocolat supérieur au lait 40% (sucre, lait en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, émulsifiants : lécithines [soja], vanilline), sucre, lait écrémé en poudre, huile de palme, beurre concentré, émulsifiants : lécithines [soja], vanilline.

Allergens

milk, soybeans

Origin Data

Countries france, switzerland
Packaging Cardboard

European Score

0 /100
European Resident

"Pays taxes and recycles properly. Almost one of us."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 10/10
Distribution 15/15

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in Italy (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Main European ingredients: Chocolat supérieur au lait, sucre, lait écrémé en poudre (+10 pts)
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (2 countries) (+15 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

With a critical score of 0/100, Tablette Kinder Chocolat Chocolat au Lait x24 -300g shows a total lack of verifiable alignment with European industrial sovereignty.

When analyzing the corporate structure of Ferrero, Kinder, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Data confirms that this product fails to meet basic regional ecological expectations.

Regarding health, this product offers full transparency on its ingredients and composition.

Transparency from Ferrero, Kinder on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

Fact-based analysis identifies the product as a poor choice for those prioritizing local roots.

Looking for better alternatives...