Skip to content
We Love European Products
Nata Thai
Nata Thai - Ecomil with score 61/100

Nata Thai - European Score 61/100

Ecomil

Nata Thai by Ecomil is rated 61/100 according to our European origin criteria. Average choice. It has some European connections but could be better.

It is a food product found in 1 countries.

200 mL

8428532192352
🛡️ Data verified by Open Food Facts
🍽️ Food

Nutritional Scores

Nutri-Score
C
Eco-Score
UNKNOWN
NOVA
4

Categories

plant based foods and beverages plant based foods dairy substitutes plant based creams coconut milks and creams plant based creams for cooking coconut creams

Ingredients

Lait de coco" (60%), eau, curry rouge" (sel marin, piment“ (0,2%), jus Concentré de citron vert (0,1%), citronnelle" (0,03%) et épices* (06%: al", gingembre", coriandre", poivre noir", paprika"), stabilisants (gomme xanthane, gomme guar), arôme naturel de coco", "Ingredients issus de l'agriculture biologique). Fabriqué dans une usine où sont également traités des fruits à coque.

Origin Data

Countries france

European Score

0 /100
European Resident

"Pays taxes and recycles properly. Almost one of us."

Detailed Breakdown:

Scoring Methodology
Headquarters 35/35
Manufacturing 0/35
Ingredients 6/10
Distribution 15/15
EU Certifications +5

Analysis:

  • Corporate headquarters in Spain (+35 pts)
  • Manufacturing location unknown
  • Main European ingredients: Lait de coco" (+6 pts)
  • Distributed exclusively in Europe (1 countries) (+15 pts)
  • European certification: eu-organic (+5 pts)
Amazon logo
Buy on Amazon

Affiliate link. Independent from score results.

Analysis & Insights

Expert Data Analysis

With a critical score of 0/100, Nata Thai shows a total lack of verifiable alignment with European industrial sovereignty.

When analyzing the corporate structure of Ecomil, we see its direct and positive impact on the regional economy.

Moderate transport mileage makes this a balanced but not leadership-level choice for the environment.

Health data for this item shows basic compliance but a limited nutritional focus.

Transparency from Ecomil on this reference is acceptable but lacks granular sourcing details.

Fact-based analysis identifies the product as a poor choice for those prioritizing local roots.

Looking for better alternatives...